Ovid writes: > Forget all the silly debates. I don't want to wait or sit around > while we argue over this silly stuff.
You mean you don't want flaming for the apostrofly in the subject? OK then, I won't mention it. > Discussions involving ... piping through less ... Keep that thought; I'm going to repurpose it below ... > ... what name do you want? Test::Even::More? That'd create a Test::Even:: namespace; I'm not sure if anything else would use it, but it'd be a bizarre cateogry if it did. (Though it does suggest we could have a Test::Odd:: counterpart, which given some of the recent discussion on this list may have its uses!) Names normally descend in specificity from left to right, but Test::More::Even doesn't really make sense. > Test::Extended? Something else? Your mentioning the less pager above reminded me that it's so-named as the opposite of more, an earlier pager it improved upon. So I wondered about Test::Less, but it appears Ingy's already using that for something. But somewhere that train of thought led me to Test::Most -- which implies "more than 'more'", and could work if you feel like claiming this module will meet most testing needs, or be useful in most test programs or something? Smylers
