On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Elliot Shank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy J. Ray wrote: > > > One thing I would like advice on (besides suggestions for future > > features), > > is, errr, the name. Right now, I'm leaning towards Test::Markup. That > > might > > wind up the YAML guys a bit, though (which is actually a > > quite-acceptable > > bonus to me), possibly the JSON camp as well. So I am also considering > > Test::Serialization, since all of these amount to forms of > > serialization. > > Even (some would say *especially*) XML. > > > > Test::Text::Format (generic interface) > Test::Text::Format::XML > Test::Text::Format::YAML > Test::Text::Format::Etcetera > Feels a bit clumsy. I tend to dislike starting out three levels deep unless the middle level already exists, and there's no "Test::Text" currently. Ovid, any thoughts? Randy -- Randy J. Ray / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org Sunnyvale, CA
