--- On Mon, 18/8/08, Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > YAML::Tiny seems to do everything that JSON does, so I > must now eat crow (nom, nom, nom, gag). > > Well, hope you found it tasty, but JSON is still a > reasonable > alternative to consider if non-Perl implementations are > better than > YAML's.
Oh, definitely agreed. I cannot assert that non-Perl implementations of JSON are any better, but JSON is simple enough that I'm pretty damned sure they are. However, YAML is so problematic that I *CAN* state that non-Perl versions are often as problematic as Perl's. As much as I aesthetically appreciate the *appearance* of YAML, I accept David Golden's argument that the diagnostics should be more focused on machine reading than human reading. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6