David Golden wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, the second one does error in the middle of the output...barely. >> Had the errors been after the 50k, the report would be doubly useless: >> >> [Output truncated after 50K] >> >> does no good when the sole purpose of such reports is to r1eport errors >> from systems you aren't looking at, or even have locally to test with. > > The report truncation will go away when we get CPAN Testers off of > email. There was some discussion of what percentage of reports are > over 50K and it's pretty darn small. Sorry you were (almost) on the > unhappy end of that. > > -- David >
That's normal. I have this knack for being the person that falls into the ditch rather than just walking safely over the bridge. :-) -=Chris
