Rick Fisk said:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 19:09 +0100, Salve J Nilsen wrote:

Yes, I'd like to avoid ad hominem attacks. This is a basic part of making any negative-feedback service into a respectable one.

You appear to be contradicting yourself here. There's no need for a hall of shame. As somebody has already pointed out, all one needs is for the list to be comprehensive, all-inclusive and paginated.

Yes, a comprehensive, all-inclusive and paginated list would be a good solution. Especially if users can reverse the list and filter it by CPAN ID. :)


[snip]

Your belief that the list is "motivational" is purely conjecture on your
part. If you have some qualitative measure which tends to support the
idea, I'd find it interesting.

Well. I'm basing my argument mostly on personal experience. I've also met several people who appreciate getting relevant negative feedback on their work. I've also met people who don't like negative feedback at all, not seldom accompanied by a "healthy-sized" sense of self. I'd like to see more of the former. :-/


In another email on the subject, you suggested "I'd like to see a world that treats volunteers with respect, but doesn't deny them negative feedback".

Classifying some module as being lower on the list of 'kwalitee' is in
fact positive feedback if no negative characterizations are added. This
is where I think there is some confusion. "Shame" and intending to heap
it on a specific set of developers is definitely negative. A score is
not negative. It is merely a score.

Good points.

I may have realized something now - that the word "Shame" is a very strong and heavy-handed word, on the same level as Quisling and Traitor. Is this correct? Sorry to ask this question, English is my second language, and although we have the same word in Norwegian - "skam", it's hardly a word we put much weight and seriousness into. When we say "skam deg!" ("Shame on you!") we do it to kids who have done something nasty (e.g. crapping on the lawn instead of in the potty.)


- Salve

--
#!/usr/bin/perl
sub AUTOLOAD{$AUTOLOAD=~/.*::(\d+)/;seek(DATA,$1,0);print#  Salve Joshua Nilsen
getc DATA}$"="'};&{'";@_=unpack("C*",unpack("u*",':4@,$'.#     <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
'2!--"5-(50P%$PL,!0X354UC-PP%/0\`'."\n"));eval "&{'@_'}";   __END__ is near! :)

Reply via email to