Barbie wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:56:43PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> There are two URLs in the report. One is for the main cpantesters.org site >> which is too broad. The other is supposed to point at information about how >> to fix the failure, but the site is down and that too seems to generic and >> mostly directed at how the author might fix their module. Not about how to >> contact the tester for more information. >> http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes > > When filing a bug report can you: > > a) tell me what site is down > b) tell me where you got the above link > > If you're refering to the above link being down, then this is NOT in the > email, and if it is, then please forward me a copy as the templates > haven't used the grango.org address for quite some time.
Like I said, here's the email. http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/03/msg3537903.html Says it's using the latest version of CPAN::Reporter (1.1705) and it sure is there in the source code. CPAN-Reporter-1.1705$ ack grango lib/CPAN/Reporter.pm 1008:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes 1020:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes 1030:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes 1527:* [http://cpantest.grango.org] -- documentation and wiki lib/CPAN/Reporter.pod 171:L<http://cpantest.grango.org> -- documentation and wiki t/Helper.pm 461:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes 473:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes 483:http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes Also http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html isn't working. I tried the above ID (3537903) and it ground for a few minutes and timed out. Ahh, this time I got "ERROR Sorry, the NNTP is currently unavailable, please try again shortly." >> What there should be is simple instructions on how to get a message back to >> the tester. > > This was discussed as an option, but felt wasn't the right method. Bear > in mind there are still several testers who hide their address so no-one > can respond to them. We are aim to change this with the HTTP submission > solution. It's been a year. Color me impatient. And I don't mind a handful that hide their address. If they don't want to get contacted that badly, fine. Like I said, the details aren't important so long as there's a clear, single step to get more information from the reporter. That's all I really want to hear is that's in the plan. -- I have a date with some giant cartoon robots and booze.
