Andy Lester wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>>> use Test::More tests => 14;
>>> ok( 1 );
>>> done_testing();
>>
>> You would try that. :P
>
>
> It's not that I tried it, it's that I didn't know what would happen if I
> did both together, because it wasn't clear to me up front if
> done_testing() replaced no_plan or worked with it.
Its shown in the plan documentation working with no_plan and stated at the end
of the done_testing() docs: This is safer than and replaces the "no_plan" plan.
Oddly enough, done_testing() and no_plan do not work together. They probably
should.
use Test::More "no_plan";
pass();
done_testing()'
ok 1
1..1
The plan was already output at
/usr/local/perl/5.10.0/lib/5.10.0/Test/Builder.pm line 2341.
1..1
Anyhow, I was just poking fun because you're Mr. Test Count.
--
91. I am not authorized to initiate Jihad.
-- The 213 Things Skippy Is No Longer Allowed To Do In The U.S. Army
http://skippyslist.com/list/
