Ovid wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com>
>>
>>>> %$Test = %$child;
>>>>
>>>> Watch out for edge cases of when subtest() dies, make sure the
>>>> parent's guts
>>>> get put back.
>>> "local" should be good for doing that right?
>> Normally, yes. local $Test will localize the value of $Test, which is a
>> reference, not its guts. local %$Test would seem to be the right thing, but
>> I'm not sure if that will DWIM.
>
> I've generally been extremely pleased with how robust 'local $hash->{value}'
> is,
> but you can't localize lexical variables.
The Test::Builder singleton is now a package global.
--
Just call me 'Moron Sugar'.
http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05182002.shtml
