Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> wrote:
> I keep looking at subtests and keeping thinking that if there wasn't a test
> count to manage, would we need subtests? Do we need all that complexity? If
> it's just about the test count, can it be managed a better way?
>
> I understand wanting "blocks of tests" and the ability to make plans for just
> those blocks, but do we need a discrete test state for that? For example,
> Test::Class provides most of what subtests provide without special support.
I use subtests a lot nowadays, but mostly for grouping. I don't care
at all for the separate plan for subtests.
If tomorrow the sub subtest in Test::More became:
sub subtest {
diag("Testing ".shift);
shift->();
}
I probably would not notice :)
Bye,
--
Pedro Melo
@pedromelo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
http://about.me/melo
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org
