On 02/28/2013 10:45 AM, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Mark Stosberg <m...@summersault.com > <mailto:m...@summersault.com>> wrote: > >> Then you have the WWW::Mechanize sub-classes. Here's a sampling: >> >> Test::WWW::Mechanize > > As far as Test::WWW::Mechanize goes, I don't see that the testingness is > really a role. It's really mostly a bunch of wrappers and some > convenience functions.
Thanks for the feedback, Andy. I'd like to have a Mechanize that has both the testing functions, and also JavaScript support, which the WWW::Scripter sub-class has. I haven't looked closely into it, but the surface it seems like I should be to combine a "does testing" role with a "does javascript" role to achieve this result. Mark
