On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 06:00:55PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2000, at 11:57, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> > I would go for UCS-2 (UTF-16) as soon as possible as the preferred
> > internal encoding.
>
> You know, of course, that UCS-2 ne UTF-16 (specifically, surrogates).
Surrogates, schmurrogates. I will worry about them when we get the
other stuff working first.
> What's Perl's take on characters where ord($c) > 0xffff, anyway?
> (These two issues intertwine, since if you use UTF-16, and hence
> surrogates, it's natural to expect support for characters up to [I think]
> 0x10ffff, while if you just use UCS-2, you're restricted to 0xffff.)
>
> Cheers,
> Philip
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
