Re: Encode's .enc files and a question

[Philip Newton]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Mark Leisher wrote:

> There may some day be a use for the Unicode codepoint 0x0000.  It might be
> better to make this 0xFFFF, which is a guaranteed non-character in Unicode and
> probably in ISO10646.

Isn't that the natural character to use for null-terminated strings? For
example, if I'm processing UTF-8 text in C, "foo" is equivalent to 0066
006F 006F 0000. In which case, it's very much in use already.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>