Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 04:29:34PM +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>> If I throw jis208.enc into the pot, then without -O it is 12s
>> and with -O approx 4 minutes for a trivial saving.
>
>Whatever is default on 14550 didn't make a very nice noise while compiling
>on my FreeBSD box. Load average was 0.11, and one of the disks was thrashing
>a lot. [Unfortunately I have upgraded to hard disks without LED jumpers, so
>I can no longer use the front panel blinkenlights to say whether it harassing
>the source directory, /tmp, swap or /usr]
>
>Maybe I should figure out how vmstat works, but I have my suspicion that it's
>hammering the machine in the wrong way, and maybe it could trade using more
>memory for more less disk access in order to compile faster.
>[Then again, more memory => swap => disks, and as best I can tell on FreeBSD
>less memory => free memory used as extra disk buffers, so the OS is doing its
>best however you config things]. Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

That version would have been doing substring search on on EUC_JP.
There are some large hashes - but I have not had a problem on my machines
(but even the laptop has 192M).

14564 will stop doing the search - but perhaps will use slightly more memory
as a result.




>
>Nicholas Clark
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/


Reply via email to