At Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:03:17 -0700, Daisuke Maki wrote: > ( don't know if this is the correct mailing list to throw this to -- pls > feel free to redirect me to the appropriate parties )
I think this list is the appropriate place. > I suspect that there are a lot of us out there who don't necessarily > welcome this namespace pollusion. Couldn't it at least be in @EXPORT_OK, > or somehow provide a pseudo OO-ish interface like some other modules? > > i.e. > > use Encode qw/ encode /; > encode( ... ); > > or > > use Encode; > Encode->encode( ... ) > > I think that at least there should be a choice to export/not export > these symbols. What's wrong with use Encode (); ? -- Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
