On Tuesday, Oct 1, 2002, at 10:56 Asia/Tokyo, Autrijus Tang wrote: > Encode::TW is correct, Encode::Alias not. > > /Autrijus/ > > --- /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/Encode/Alias.pm Thu Jun 6 > 22:31:31 2002 > +++ lib/Encode/Alias.pm Tue Oct 1 09:55:24 2002 > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ > define_alias( qr/\bks_c_5601-1987$/i => '"cp949"' ); > # for Encode::TW > define_alias( qr/\bbig-?5$/i => '"big5-eten"' ); > - define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?et(?:en)$/i => '"big5-eten"' ); > + define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?et(?:en)?$/i => '"big5-eten"' ); > define_alias( qr/\btca[-_]?big5$/i => '"big5-eten"' ); > define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?hk(?:scs)?$/i => '"big5-hkscs"' ); > define_alias( qr/\bhk(?:scs)?[-_]?big5$/i => '"big5-hkscs"' ); > <mime-attachment>
/¥bAutrijus¥b/, Thanx. applied in my repository. HV, please go ahead w/ this patch for 5.9. But how serious do you consider this bug is? I considered the last one (*.ucm fix) very serious and did $VERSION++ as soon as I reckoned (which took much longer than it should've been. Sorry). But this one I am not so sure because I guess most users would simply use 'big5'. How many users do you think will (use|be using) 'big5-et'? I would like to polish further before I commit $Encode::VERSION++ unless you object and call for immediate release. Dan the Encode Maintainer
