On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:25:43 +0200 Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the original VISCII data came (I think) from the Unicode web > site, maybe this discrepancy should be more reported even more officially? I doubt whether the Unicode consortium had provided any viscii-Unicode mapping table under www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/. I could suppose the table shipped on Perl was borrowed from czyborra.com. The table there ( http://czyborra.com/charsets/vietnamese.html ) has wrongly the duplicated <A^?> and no <a^?>. The following site provides a correct table. http://www.vietstd.org/document/unicode.html SADAHIRO Tomoyuki
