Eric Cholet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Le 1 janv. 04, Ã 17:50, Rafael Garcia-Suarez a Ãcrit :
>
>> +(However, and as a limitation of the current implementation, using
>> +C<\w> or C<\W> I<inside> a C<[...]> character class will still match
>> +with byte semantics.)
>
>I don't think it applies to \w, only \W. \x{df} matches [\w] just fine,
>as shown in Andreas' bug report.Do negated classes work at all ? What does /[^\w]/ do ? (I looked at this stuff ages ago and I thought unicode classes (including negated ones worked, if that is true then fix may just be the magical \W expander expanding to wrong thing...)
