Eric Cholet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Le 1 janv. 04, Ã 17:50, Rafael Garcia-Suarez a Ãcrit : > >> +(However, and as a limitation of the current implementation, using >> +C<\w> or C<\W> I<inside> a C<[...]> character class will still match >> +with byte semantics.) > >I don't think it applies to \w, only \W. \x{df} matches [\w] just fine, >as shown in Andreas' bug report.
Do negated classes work at all ? What does /[^\w]/ do ? (I looked at this stuff ages ago and I thought unicode classes (including negated ones worked, if that is true then fix may just be the magical \W expander expanding to wrong thing...)