>>>>> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:39:20 -0700, Jerzy Giergiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
> Neither of those fallbacks is OK, I want รก converted to accent > stripped version of itself i.e. a. The second solution isn't very > helpful either, it's basically tr replacement table which is not much > fun to write when majority of upper 128 characters need to be > converted. There's gotta be a simpler and more elegant solution. > thanks anyway. Text::Unidecode -- andreas
