Why not get the PDK from ActiveState and distribute an EXE instead of
the whole Perl bundle? Do you really need to distribute Perl to every
workstation? Why not locate Perl on a common shared drive or server?
One Perl distribution that is used by 100 PC's is a lot easier to manage
than 100 Perl distributions!
For what its worth...my opinion that is.
Shawn J
-----Original Message-----
From: Declan Mullen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A perl interpreter that doesn't require registry or PATH
settings ?
Hi,
I need to deploy a windows Perl interpreter to a large number of
NT4/Win2k systems that are owned by other departments within my company.
In order to reduce the objections to this deployment, I need a version
of Perl that does not require the registry or the PATH environment
variable to modified, (explicitly calling the Perl .exe to run scripts
is very acceptable). In addition the interpreter needs to be augmentable
with additional Perl modules. However, I don't need any ActiveX or web
server support.
Many thanks for any recommendations.
BTW I'm a newbie to Perl.
Regards,
Declan
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Admin mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-admin