On 30 Jul 03, Sam Schinke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello Sisyphus, > > Tuesday, July 29, 2003, 8:36:41 PM, you wrote: > > > S> An excerpt received off-list (my thanks to that person) which I'd like to > S> post to the list: > > >> > >> It seems that the problem arises from the mail client used by the > >> sender. Take a look at the header of the message from Stephen > >> Patterson. IMHO, OE does EXACTLY what the header says > OE does treat the MIME type correctly. It is a "standard" MIME type.
Yup, I'm signing all my messages the standard way, and seeing as pegasus, mutt and mozilla (and probably more) programs interpret them correctly, we can see that MS is off doing their usual thing. Just to give a little perspective on things, I started signing messages after I noticed my mailserver was getting a lot of rejections due to people sending spam with headers forged to appear as though they came from (non-existing) accounts on my server. The signature on my messages verifies that the message came from me and that it has not been altered, just in case people started picking my username to put in forged headers. -- Stephen Patterson http://www.lexx.uklinux.net http://patter.mine.nu [EMAIL PROTECTED] remove SPAM to reply Linux Counter No: 142831 GPG Public key: 252B8B37 Last one down the pub's an MCSE
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
