Chris Wagner wrote:

> At 07:33 AM 3/3/05 -0800, $Bill Luebkert wrote:
> 
>>I tried 3 different lengths of $text and substr is the clear winner.
>>Longest string:
>>           Rate     RE substr
>>RE      916926/s     --   -70%
>>substr 3076923/s   236%     --
> 
> 
> 
> That's very interesting, I ran ur exact code (except for $x++) and I got a
> much smaller difference.
> 
>             Rate     RE substr
> RE     1336898/s     --    -3%
> substr 1381215/s     3%     --
> 
> 27 seconds
> 
>             Rate     RE substr
> RE     1319261/s     --    -9%
> substr 1445087/s    10%     --
> 
> 26 seconds
> 
> I have build 811 on Celeron 1.4GHz.  Do u have some optimization that
> drastically speeds up substr?

That's interesting that your RE runs faster than mine and your CPU is
only 1.4.

I'm running B811 on an AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Removing the $x++, I get (for longest string) :

        RE      949668/s     --   -72%
        substr 3441156/s   262%     --

May have something to do with my 64-bit architecture or the fact
that your on a Celeron rather than a normal Pentium.

-- 
  ,-/-  __      _  _         $Bill Luebkert    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (_/   /  )    // //       DBE Collectibles    Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / ) /--<  o // //      Castle of Medieval Myth & Magic http://www.todbe.com/
-/-' /___/_<_</_</_    http://dbecoll.tripod.com/ (My Perl/Lakers stuff)
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
Perl-Win32-Users@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

Reply via email to