> > > Its great that it's already done but the bigger question, to > > me, is why does it copy a reference in the second example. I > > don't get it. > > In the first example, it's a list of scalars. The scalars are > copied. In the > second example, it's a list of anonymous hash references. The > references are > copied. And the scalars they refer to are of course one and the same.
OK, I sort of get it. But what hash is it a reference to? If you wanted to access or modify the hash directly where is it? _______________________________________________ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list Perl-Win32-Users@listserv.ActiveState.com To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
