Steve Sotis wrote:
>
> I will need to start communicating with a server via a non-standard port in
> the next week or so, and in preparation, I stopped by the LWP reference to
> see if anything about ports was mentioned. NOT!
>
> And, there will be no URL for me to access, just an IP.
>
> Can I use an IP/Port with LWP, i.e. '1.2.3.4:123' for the request object?
Don't see why not - did you try it?
> Is there anything special I would need for the content_type?
See below.
> Is there a better alternative to LWP?
Depends on what you're trying to do.
--
,-/- __ _ _ $Bill Luebkert ICQ=14439852
(_/ / ) // // DBE Collectibles http://www.todbe.com/
/ ) /--< o // // Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dbecoll.webjump.com/
-/-' /___/_<_</_</_ http://www.freeyellow.com/members/dbecoll/
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Web mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-web
