World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
read it there
IE does not comply as tight as NS
but then NS does not either
got to love browser wars
have fun take a chill pill or a beer
perhaps both
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer v. Netscape
> Why don't you just BITE ME you arrogant #@!-HOLE. I thought this list was
to get information from people who are willing share it. If you don't want
to share it, stay out. I guess we're all not as smart as you think you are.
>
> Stanley G. Martin
> Midwest Consulting Group
> Sprint Platform & Strategy Mgmt
> 913.315.3133
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: philip.newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:36 AM
> To: stanley.g.martin; perl-win32-web; tim.prohaska
> Subject: Re: Internet Explorer v. Netscape
>
> << File: Re_ Internet Explorer v.TXT >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > That fixed it, but it brings up the question WHY??? This
> > worked in IE just fine without the tags. Are the tags really
> > a requirement and IE just ignores it?
>
> Two answers to this:
>
> 1) Yes.
> 2) What does the standard say? IMO, people who code HTML for a living
should
> know what the HTML standard says and where to get it. Apparently, few do.
>
> Cheers,
> Philip
> --
> Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
> If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
>
_______________________________________________
Perl-Win32-Web mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/perl-win32-web
