On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Tue 05 Nov 2002 15:21, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the other hand, what you have doesn't appear broken, so maybe we
> > shouldn't touch it further :-).
>
> Seen Jarkko's comment? :{ He still needs the original stuff for 5.8.1, so this
> patch is turned back anyway
Good point I hadn't considered. So far we've avoided forking metaconfig
for different 5.x.x versions, and that's probably a good thing. In
retrospect, I'd agree with Jarkko.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
