putting together a tarball and announcing it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] might
elicit some
response (sorry but I personally no longer have access to z/OS anymore).
Peter Prymmer
Nicholas Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Nicholas To
Clark Dave Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "H.Merijn
02/28/2004 10:15 Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
AM [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leon Brocard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject
Re: switch from byacc to bison
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:17:05PM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:39:32AM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > But thinking about merging it, I ask myself "Is it binary compatible?"
> > and I don't think I can answer this myself.
>
> Another consideration that has just occured to me (and relevant to 5.9.1
> too), is that I haven't had any feedback yet (good or bad) from EDCDIC
> users; since I wrote the code 'blind' to handle that side of things, it
> would be nice to know that it works before it gets into the wild.
OK. This makes me wonder whether I wait until a blead snapshot (or the
5.9.1
release) on the assumption that it will be easier to get someone to test
EDCDIC from a tarball than by rsyncing.
I'm going to did through Jarkko's contact list to see who might be able
to test.
Nicholas Clark