In perl.git, the branch sprout/repeat has been created

<http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/54c2338e8b1d062dbaf3cfa3a5682181e41b63af?hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000>

        at  54c2338e8b1d062dbaf3cfa3a5682181e41b63af (commit)

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 54c2338e8b1d062dbaf3cfa3a5682181e41b63af
Author: Father Chrysostomos <spr...@cpan.org>
Date:   Mon Oct 20 23:29:01 2014 -0700

    Optimise ($foo)x1 and ($foo)x0 in list cx
    
    If the repeat count is 1, then we simply remove the repetition operator
    and have the ops of the lhs evaluated, regardless of what they are.
    
    If the repeat count is 0, then we only optimise if the lhs is a simple
    scalar or constant.  We optimise the whole thing down to the empty
    list.

M       op.c

commit af73103a8959c234faa2c3de70a5174f3f1a886b
Author: Father Chrysostomos <spr...@cpan.org>
Date:   Mon Oct 20 19:32:44 2014 -0700

    pp.c:pp_repeat: Remove #if 0 code
    
    This was intended to fix 20010809.028, but treating
    20010809.028 as not-a-bug is the only way to preserve
    backward-compatibility.  See the previous commit’s
    explanation.

M       pp.c

commit 3bda218d41b02ec4d46f2f731dce5743247037ef
Author: Father Chrysostomos <spr...@cpan.org>
Date:   Mon Oct 20 19:29:43 2014 -0700

    repeat.t: Remove to-do test for 20010809.028
    
    Aka #7505, the bug was that list repeat didn’t copy its
    elements.  But list repeat hasn’t copied its elements for
    years now, and code could be relying on the current
    behaviour of foreach(($var)x2) { ... } which aliases $_
    to $var twice.  We also have tests for the current
    behaviour.

M       t/op/repeat.t
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Perl5 Master Repository

Reply via email to