Nathan Torkington [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *>John L. Allen writes: *>> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-1939586.html?tag=st.ne.1002.tgif.ni *> *>Dick (sorry "David") Hardt is going to have to learn to watch himself *>around reporters. The only paragraphs of "Perl sucks" in that whole *>article are provided by *his* words. It's disgusting. I imagine, by the context, that he was completely misquoted and edited here. I am guessing that the part about complexity, etc. would have been followed by 'but our tools help make Perl development a breeze' or somesuch. It's a horrible article anyway just by the way it has no point, no meat of the matter and enough buzzwords to propel the titanic across the atlantic. I'm not even optimistic that readers got past the first paragraph if skimming. e.
