On Sun 14 Nov 2004 23:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:01:50AM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > I'm currently working on a patch to handle (?{...}) code snippets better.
> > The main thing is does is that tokeniser recognises these within patterns
> > and spits them out for the parser to compile, rather than leaving then for
> > the regexp compiler, ie
> >
> > /abc(?{$x++})def$foo/
> >
>
> Dave,
>
> There are currently at least 14 open Perlbugs (at least by the subject)
> that have to do with problems with (?{...}), primarily with segfault.
> While your working in that code, would you like a test script made up of the
> current issues? I'd be glad to get one set up if you'd like.
Related?
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=4383
Created: Wed Oct 04 23:48:50 2000
Creator: hmbrand
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: open
Subject: Lexical variables in regex code blocks not propagated
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.5, & 5.9.x, and 809 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i,
AIX 4.3, AIX 5.2, SuSE 9.1, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
