[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:09:25 +0100, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:35:18AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
I thought MakeMaker was dead.
Who told you? It is not.
Me, sort of. :)
Its not dead, just doomed.
Wouldn't it then be better to concentrate on pushing Module::Builder
instead?
Not really... EU::MM is very popular and just simply works for most cases.
Would be nice to have a new release, containing patches which now rot
in MM's rt.cpan.org queue.
I would say EU::MM is much better than M::B at the moment.
Just my thoughts..
Alb
--
Alberto Sim�es - Departamento de Inform�tica - Universidade do Minho
Much as I hate to say it, the Computer Science view of language design
has gotten too inbred in recent years. The Computer Scientists should
pay more attention to the Linguists, who have a much better handle on
how people prefer to communicate.
--Larry Wall
