Orton, Yves wrote: > > Consider that libwin32 hasn't been updated on CPAN since 08 Jul 2002 > (libwin32-0.191). > > I am sympathetic to the point about not wanting to add a whole host of > modules to the core, especially if they are specific to only one OS, but IMO > it seems that libwin32 should at least be a p5p maintained package.
Right. Volunteers welcome. One could even envision a special source tarball for Win32 that bundles all libwin32 modules. That's a nice idea. Just find somebody to do it.
