Jan Dubois wrote:
> I completely agree that we should set up a perl-libwin32 mailing list,
> and as I said before, I don't care where it is being hosted. But I
> would like to point out that hosting a mailing list at ActiveState does
> in no way imply that its content is exclusively managed by ActiveState.
> See for example the perl-xml mailing list.
>
> Anyways, if a perl.org list hasn't been set up by January, then I will
> ask the ASPN team to set one up at ActiveState.com to get things started.
> (I'll be gone for the rest of the month starting Monday).
I read most lists via nntp. I suppose I'm not the only one so I'd prefer
a perl.org based list for this selfish reason.
> PS: Is there any specific reason for your general negative attitude
> towards ActiveState, and is there anything I can do to about it?
I have the impression that you can't avoid your users / the OSS
community being a bit paranoid when you work in an Open Source based
company. (Of course, I'm not speaking on behalf on my employer here :)
--
They used to drive a stake of wood through his heart in the grave. As if it
wasn't broken already.
-- Ulysses
