> The original SCO user who
> supplied the plain -B version probably was using a version of the compiler
> that passed along unrecognized switches to the linker.

More precisely, plain `-B' is documented explicitly for `cc' in 5.0.4,
but not recognized in some earlier sco5 versions.  `-Wl', in contrast,
is quite generic.

> I'd expect that
> the -Wl,-B version should be safe across a wider range of compiler
> versions.

So do I, for the reasons above.

Reply via email to