On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:53:32AM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > The new test 146 has been failing on both VMS and Win32. At least on > VMS, the failure is because it's not accounting for the newline you are > guaranteed to get at EOF, and I suspect it's the same issue on Win32. > After the attached, the test passes on VMS.
For future reference, in these sorts of situations its perhaps better to use -l to produce more predictable output. > --- t/op/bop.t;-0 Tue Dec 14 02:09:24 2004 > +++ t/op/bop.t Thu Dec 16 08:24:18 2004 > @@ -324,4 +324,4 @@ > > # [rt.perl.org 33003] > # This would cause a segfault > -is( runperl(prog => 'eval q($#a>>=1); print 1'), 1 ); > +like( runperl(prog => 'eval q($#a>>=1); print 1'), "^1\n?" ); -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ 5. It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea. -- RFC 1925
