On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:06:36PM -0000, Orton, Yves wrote:
> Also Schwern, ive been trying to get it to build from the zip file linked
> above. The first time I build i get the following test failure:
> 
>   t\00signature.............WARNING: This key is not certified with a
> trusted signature!
>   Primary key fingerprint: B484 04B8 E9D5 93A2 5CA8  F1AA 4F82 E2DC 2C3F
> 3F34

I think you need to do some sort of gpg jiggery pokery to get that to shut up.
Look in the Module::Signature man page maybe?


>   ==> SKIPPED CHECKING 'Makefile'! (run Makefile.PL to ensure its integrity)

No idea what that means.  It should have been skipped by the MANIFEST.SKIP.
Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP.  Check what
"perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP" looks like.  It should look like this.

http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MANIFEST.SKIP

Not like this.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/MANIFEST.SKIP


> <===
>   Not in MANIFEST: pmfiles.dat

That's not something produced by MakeMaker or Test::Simple.


>   t\00signature.............WARNING: This key is not certified with a
> trusted signature!
>   Primary key fingerprint: B484 04B8 E9D5 93A2 5CA8  F1AA 4F82 E2DC 2C3F
> 3F34
>   ==> SKIPPED CHECKING 'Makefile'! (run Makefile.PL to ensure its integrity)
> <===
>   Not in MANIFEST: foo

Grr.  Mandatory file locking strikes again.  is_fh.t didn't close a temp
file before unlinking it.


-- 
Michael G Schwern        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
"Please hold while reality is adjusted to match my ideal world."
        r- njt
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:52:55 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:52:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:52:55 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx52.postini.com ([64.18.0.219] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CemhD-0000ip-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:52:55 -0800
Received: from source ([63.251.223.186]) by exprod5mx52.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:55:37 PST
Received: (qmail 4282 invoked by uid 514); 16 Dec 2004 03:55:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4261 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2004 03:55:33 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Check-By: la.mx.develooper.com
Received-SPF: pass (x1.develooper.com: local policy includes SPF record at 
spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:55:23 -0500
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orton, Yves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 'Steve Hay' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa 
ture?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.64

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:06:36PM -0000, Orton, Yves wrote:
> Also Schwern, ive been trying to get it to build from the zip file linked
> above. The first time I build i get the following test failure:
> 
>   t\00signature.............WARNING: This key is not certified with a
> trusted signature!
>   Primary key fingerprint: B484 04B8 E9D5 93A2 5CA8  F1AA 4F82 E2DC 2C3F
> 3F34

I think you need to do some sort of gpg jiggery pokery to get that to shut up.
Look in the Module::Signature man page maybe?


>   ==> SKIPPED CHECKING 'Makefile'! (run Makefile.PL to ensure its integrity)

No idea what that means.  It should have been skipped by the MANIFEST.SKIP.
Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP.  Check what
"perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP" looks like.  It should look like this.

http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MANIFEST.SKIP

Not like this.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/MANIFEST.SKIP


> <===
>   Not in MANIFEST: pmfiles.dat

That's not something produced by MakeMaker or Test::Simple.


>   t\00signature.............WARNING: This key is not certified with a
> trusted signature!
>   Primary key fingerprint: B484 04B8 E9D5 93A2 5CA8  F1AA 4F82 E2DC 2C3F
> 3F34
>   ==> SKIPPED CHECKING 'Makefile'! (run Makefile.PL to ensure its integrity)
> <===
>   Not in MANIFEST: foo

Grr.  Mandatory file locking strikes again.  is_fh.t didn't close a temp
file before unlinking it.


-- 
Michael G Schwern        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
"Please hold while reality is adjusted to match my ideal world."
        r- njt
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:23 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:23 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemhf-0000l0-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:23 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx127.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:06 PST
Received: (qmail 47196 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 47181 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:05 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
        tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) 
(204.127.198.39)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:55:12 -0800
Received: from [192.168.2.93] 
(c-67-162-109-157.client.comcast.net[67.162.109.157])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <2004121603550801500rv78re>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:55:08 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:50:00 -0600
To: "David G. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Struts-Chain] Only one chain for entire request lifecycle?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

Julian:

In addition to the Chain Action, you can definitely configure a chain 
which dispatches to a sub-chain based on the request URI.  The base 
chain is designed to provide backwards compatible behavior with 
existing Struts installations, but with a bit of adjustment, you can 
definitely break things wide open.

It's been a while since I looked at Cocoon, so the model, and 
especially the configuration for it is pretty vague.  If you want to 
be more specific about what you're aiming for, maybe we can work out 
a config strategy.  It will be a little raw now, but as people get 
ideas for best practices, we can gradually find ways to provide more 
explicit configuration support for them.

Joe




>I was looking at the struts-chain config
>(http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-chain/src/c
>onf/chain-config.xml?rev=1.10&view=markup)
>  and was wondering if one can apply different chains
>depending on the request URI?  From what is available
>in the SVN repository it looks like all requests go
>through the "servlet-standard" chain.  This leads me
>to presume one cannot define "servlet-standardA",
>"servlet-standardB", and so on...that would map to
>different requests.  My hopes is that the chain
>mapping would be synonymous with Cocoon's sitemap
>concepts with several "pipelines".


-- 
Joe Germuska            
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
http://blog.germuska.com    
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction"  -The Ex

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:26 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:26 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx94.postini.com ([64.18.0.82] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemhi-0000lB-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:26 -0800
Received: from source ([208.186.168.62]) by exprod5mx94.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:08 PST
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by vps.vlists.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id iBG3u8P15168
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:56:08 -0600
Received: by vps.vlists.net (TLB v0.11a (1.26 tibbs 1998/09/22 04:41:41)); Wed, 
15 Dec 2004 21:55:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by vps.vlists.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iBG3tq714422
        for felvtalk-utils; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:55:52 -0600
Received: from smtp4.wiscmail.wisc.edu (hermes.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.190])
        by vps.vlists.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBG3ti814397
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:55:44 -0600
Received: from avs-daemon.smtp4.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtp4.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,
 15 Dec 2004 21:55:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from wiscmail.wisc.edu (sneezy [144.92.197.154])
 by smtp4.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:55:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [144.92.197.221] (Forwarded-For: [128.104.61.158])
 by mailst3.doit.wisc.edu (mshttpd); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:55:23 -0600
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:55:23 -0600
From: BONNIE J KALMBACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fu doesn't spray anymore - postscript
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Ovo2GK7iPlrlhVASeQssHA)"
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-5, Version=4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.2.0,
 Antispam-Data: 2004.12.15.42, SenderIP=144.92.197.154
Virus-Information: Virus Scanned By VLists.Net For Your Protection.
Virus-Status: Virus Scanner Found No Virus
Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.585, required 5,
        autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.01, BAYES_00 -2.60)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:59.15679/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.0616 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_Ovo2GK7iPlrlhVASeQssHA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline

Trying be a bit more clear - Fu doesn't come into contact with the 
other six kitties in the house. He's pretty old and doesn't seem to 
mind staying in the second floor bedroom where he has a cat tree with a 
good view by the window. Occasionally, I will let him walk around the 
house after putting the other kitties out of sight in another room. But 
I have watch him because if he does catch a strong scent he will start 
to back up to a wall to spray..then it's back to his bedroom. My 
computer is in there, so I do spend lots of time in there with "the 
Foozer" purring on my lap.

Bonnie

--Boundary_(ID_Ovo2GK7iPlrlhVASeQssHA)
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-disposition: inline

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp6.wiscmail.wisc.edu (fafnerpvt [144.92.197.203])
 by mailst3.doit.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:11:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from avs-daemon.smtp6.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtp6.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:11:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from vps.vlists.net (vps.vlists.net [208.186.168.62])
 by smtp6.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Wed,
 15 Dec 2004 21:11:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])    by vps.vlists.net 
(8.11.6/8.11.6)
 with SMTP id iBG3BNh17330      for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,
 15 Dec 2004 21:11:23 -0600
Received: by vps.vlists.net (TLB v0.11a (1.26 tibbs 1998/09/22 04:41:41)); Wed,
 15 Dec 2004 21:11:09 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])      by vps.vlists.net (8.11.6/8.11.6)
 id iBG3B9L16889        for felvtalk-utils; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:11:09 -0600
Received: from smtp7.wiscmail.wisc.edu (hagen.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.163])
 by vps.vlists.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBG3Ax816839   for
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:10:59 -0600
Received: from avs-daemon.smtp7.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtp7.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,
 15 Dec 2004 21:10:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from wiscmail.wisc.edu (sneezy [144.92.197.154])
 by smtp7.wiscmail.wisc.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:10:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [144.92.197.221] (Forwarded-For: [128.104.61.158])
 by mailst3.doit.wisc.edu (mshttpd); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:10:58 -0600
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:10:58 -0600
From: BONNIE J KALMBACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Massive Spraying Issue or Fu doesn't spray anymore
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
X-Accept-Language: en
Precedence: list
Virus-Information: Virus Scanned By VLists.Net For Your Protection.
Virus-Status: Virus Scanner Found No Virus
Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.584, required 5,
        autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.01, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-Spam-Score:
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-7, Version=4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.2.0,
 Antispam-Data: 2004.12.15.34, SenderIP=208.186.168.62
X-Spam-Report: IsSpam=no, Probability=7%, Hits=__CD 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0,
 __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0,
 __SANE_MSGID 0
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-3, Version=4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.2.0,
 Antispam-Data: 2004.12.15.42, SenderIP=144.92.197.154
Original-recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm sure my son's 18 year-old cat's spraying issue was behavioral. "Fu" 
just doesn't like other cats because he was attacked regularly by my 
son's roomate's cat (an unneutered male) as a kitten. Now Fu stays with 
me and he has his own room and he doesn't spray anymore.

Bonnie


--Boundary_(ID_Ovo2GK7iPlrlhVASeQssHA)--
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:30 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:30 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemhm-0000lK-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:30 -0800
Received: from source ([69.16.138.164]) by exprod5mx116.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:13 PST
Received: from [69.16.138.164] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 16EDA3C244; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:54:35 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx118.postini.com [64.18.0.32])
        by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E5F43C237
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:54:31 -0600 (CST)
Received: from source ([64.233.170.207]) by exprod5mx118.postini.com
        ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:54:38 PST
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so1560006rnf
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:54:38 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        
b=PzM9hUf5a3ck9CWoq4WxzXi2twJnPfSi7xNn4z4H1WAvv1fuhfSqOXlTteMUbxsyT68MWEi06H6gHEA+Rcdiqsxga3nZceHJy5Qx64rOJeELRoQObT/MWFZP1YRuMsrvo4r32sHe+a/F1I7mh6RVvBHL6FxCcQLzvyDcsp3NY8M=
Received: by 10.38.97.8 with SMTP id u8mr2861440rnb;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.88.45 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:54:37 +1100
From: Eric Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] wcfxs causing constant CPU spikes
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [65/3] 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Eric Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
        <asterisk-users.lists.digium.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

I'm not sure if it is the CPU spikes or not but there definately is a
high level of flakiness with the card. ie very low gain levels and
often for no reason will refuse to accept calls until the driver is
reloaded. Honestly at this time I am recommedning all my customers
with Analog lines to stick with their traditional PBX and just attach
an FXS VoIP gateway to it.


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:03:43 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 15, 2004 09:27 pm, Michael Welter wrote:
> > Yes?  Is there a workaround, or do I tell my customer to go find
> > something else?
> 
> Are the CPU spikes causing you trouble or did you just notice them when poking
> around?  I see CPU spikes but don't have any issues at all (noise or
> otherwise).
> 
> -A.
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:32 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:32 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx62.postini.com ([64.18.0.175] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemho-0000lT-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:32 -0800
Received: from source ([204.153.247.10]) by exprod5mx62.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:56:15 EST
Received: from host10.octanews.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id D43EB6C8A5; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:56:14 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from aten.hostingave.net (aten.hostingave.net [209.224.51.129])
        by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D04A6C81A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:56:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 170 invoked by uid 89); 16 Dec 2004 03:57:36 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Pulse of the Twin Cities" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:57:36 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [Mpls] Group pushes downtown rafting - Check Your Pulse! 
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Minneapolis Issues Forum <mpls.mnforum.org>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mapnp.Geeks.ORG/pipermail/mpls>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:50.41643/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:92.8780 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL 
        autolearn=ham version=2.64

Group pushes downtown rafting
Proposed $25 million river construction has support of some U.S. reps
by Carey L. Biron
http://pulsetc.com/article.php?sid=1528 

Over the past decade Minneapolis residents have again begun to turn their 
attention to the Mississippi, after decades of menting its banks and using 
it as an industrial sewer. The Mississippi River has historically served as 
a crucial wellspring for life in Minneapolis, but as the city�s population 
spread away from the river�s waters, so did their attention. Over the past 
decade the city has begun turning again to the river, noticing a resource 
that has been continually manacled and industrialized. Since the early 
1990s, one small group has been advocating for a long-term cleanup of the 
river by restoring a small part of it to its original form.
 ------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Neumann
Pulse of the Twin Cities
3200 Chicago Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55407
612.824.0000 phone
612.822.0342 fax
http://pulsetc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

"Your Locally Grown Alternative Newspaper" 


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:35 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:35 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx95.postini.com ([64.18.0.83] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemhr-0000lc-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:35 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx95.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:17 PST
Received: (qmail 47196 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 47181 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:05 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
        tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) 
(204.127.198.39)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:55:12 -0800
Received: from [192.168.2.93] 
(c-67-162-109-157.client.comcast.net[67.162.109.157])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <2004121603550801500rv78re>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:55:08 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:50:00 -0600
To: "David G. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Struts-Chain] Only one chain for entire request lifecycle?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.64

Julian:

In addition to the Chain Action, you can definitely configure a chain 
which dispatches to a sub-chain based on the request URI.  The base 
chain is designed to provide backwards compatible behavior with 
existing Struts installations, but with a bit of adjustment, you can 
definitely break things wide open.

It's been a while since I looked at Cocoon, so the model, and 
especially the configuration for it is pretty vague.  If you want to 
be more specific about what you're aiming for, maybe we can work out 
a config strategy.  It will be a little raw now, but as people get 
ideas for best practices, we can gradually find ways to provide more 
explicit configuration support for them.

Joe




>I was looking at the struts-chain config
>(http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-chain/src/c
>onf/chain-config.xml?rev=1.10&view=markup)
>  and was wondering if one can apply different chains
>depending on the request URI?  From what is available
>in the SVN repository it looks like all requests go
>through the "servlet-standard" chain.  This leads me
>to presume one cannot define "servlet-standardA",
>"servlet-standardB", and so on...that would map to
>different requests.  My hopes is that the chain
>mapping would be synonymous with Cocoon's sitemap
>concepts with several "pipelines".


-- 
Joe Germuska            
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
http://blog.germuska.com    
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction"  -The Ex

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:41 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:41 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx51.postini.com ([64.18.0.218] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Cemhx-0000ln-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:41 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx51.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:23 PST
Received: (qmail 48637 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Jakarta WebSite CVS List" <site-cvs.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 48463 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 48444 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2004 03:56:14 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=10.0
        tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:55:25 -0800
Received: (qmail 4256 invoked by uid 1170); 16 Dec 2004 03:55:23 -0000
Date: 16 Dec 2004 03:55:23 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs/site whoweare.xml
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:77.13279/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64

dfs         2004/12/15 19:55:23

  Modified:    docs/site whoweare.html
               xdocs/site whoweare.xml
  Log:
  Updated personal blurb.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.207     +3 -6      jakarta-site2/docs/site/whoweare.html
  
  Index: whoweare.html
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/docs/site/whoweare.html,v
  retrieving revision 1.206
  retrieving revision 1.207
  diff -u -r1.206 -r1.207
  --- whoweare.html     14 Dec 2004 20:12:13 -0000      1.206
  +++ whoweare.html     16 Dec 2004 03:55:23 -0000      1.207
  @@ -602,12 +602,9 @@
   </p>
                                                   <p>
                   <b>Daniel Savarese</b> (dfs at savarese.org)
  -<br />
  -Daniel Savarese is co-author of How to Build a Beowulf and a featured
  -columnist for Java Pro magazine.  Among other things, he has been the
  -founder of ORO, Inc., a senior scientist at Caltech's Center for
  -Advanced Computing Research, and vice president of software development
  -at WebOS, Inc.
  +<br /> 
  +<a href="http://www.savarese.org/";>Daniel Savarese</a> is co-author of
  +How to Build a Beowulf and technical editor for Java Pro magazine.
   </p>
                                                   <p>
                   <b>Henning P. Schmiedehausen</b> (henning at apache.org)
  
  
  
  1.128     +3 -6      jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/whoweare.xml
  
  Index: whoweare.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/whoweare.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.127
  retrieving revision 1.128
  diff -u -r1.127 -r1.128
  --- whoweare.xml      14 Dec 2004 20:12:14 -0000      1.127
  +++ whoweare.xml      16 Dec 2004 03:55:23 -0000      1.128
  @@ -394,12 +394,9 @@
   </p>
               <p>
                   <b>Daniel Savarese</b> (dfs at savarese.org)
  -<br/>
  -Daniel Savarese is co-author of How to Build a Beowulf and a featured
  -columnist for Java Pro magazine.  Among other things, he has been the
  -founder of ORO, Inc., a senior scientist at Caltech's Center for
  -Advanced Computing Research, and vice president of software development
  -at WebOS, Inc.
  +<br/> 
  +<a href="http://www.savarese.org/";>Daniel Savarese</a> is co-author of
  +How to Build a Beowulf and technical editor for Java Pro magazine.
   </p>
               <p>
                   <b>Henning P. Schmiedehausen</b> (henning at apache.org)
  
  
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:53:57 2004
Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:53:57 2004
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:57 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx10.postini.com ([64.18.0.150] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CemiD-0000ly-00
        for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:53:57 -0800
Received: from source ([157.238.133.142]) by exprod5mx10.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:36 PST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (g-list administration)
Subject: WARNING! (2865120800)
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:22:04 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-ID: <g-list.mail.maclaunch.com>
X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-pstn-levels: (S: 9.37888/99.75417 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

This is an automated message from the g-list mailing list manager.

List messages sent to your address <[email protected]> have bounced.

If you read this message, your mail system has been probably fixed.

To clear the bounce counter and  prevent automatic cancelation of your 
subscription, use the Reply command in your mailer.

Check that the Subject of the reply message contains
  the confirmation ID: 2865120800,
  and the reply is directed to <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  and the 'From' address of your reply is <[email protected]>.

All questions about this mailing list not covered in the FAQ (linked at 
<http://lowendmac.com/lists/>) or netiquette page 
<http://lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml> should be sent to <mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

- - - - -
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
From jeff Thu Dec 16 03:56:12 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 19:56:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:12 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx115.postini.com ([64.18.0.87] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CemkO-0000m9-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:56:12 -0800
Received: from source ([149.68.45.24]) by exprod5mx115.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:58:54 EST
Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu (149.68.45.24) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu 
(LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 
22:59:11 -0500
Received: from MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU by MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
          release 1.8d) with spool id 7207295 for
          [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:59:08 -0500
Received: from web81410.mail.yahoo.com (206.190.37.99) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu
          (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id
          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:59:07 -0500
Received: from [216.54.216.61] by web81410.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec
          2004 19:58:50 PST
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:58:50 -0800
Reply-To: Defending the Truth discussion List
              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Defending the Truth discussion List
              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Neal Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RHETORIC] [PNEWS] America's Debt to Journalist Gary Webb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-pstn-levels: (S:53.38445/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
        autolearn=no version=2.64

I certainly would hope I would be wrong in my fears about this. Something just 
isn't right about this. I'm working on the assumption that Bush doesn't care 
about the body count...just more souls for his version of Jesus.

Skywolf.

Michael Kerjman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Had one seen an art exhibit at Chelsea Market, NYC?



sarah blum wrote:
You are right and it is frightening to think that this can be happening
and it is probably so since those who were in those administrations are
the same ones who are there now. Thanks for drawing our attention to that
possiblity.

Sarah

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Neal Smith wrote:

> I sure would like to know what he was working on. As a former professional
> Journalist, I thought his work was very solid.
>
> While I have absolutely no evidence, it would not surprise me to find those
> in the current misAdministration are getting a little payback in this.
>
> Skywolf.

-----
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
http://pnews.org/ (links)
http://pnews.org/PhpWiki/ (West Coast News Wiki)
http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (East Coast News Wiki)
===============================================================
Sub/Unsub [pnews-l - rhetoric] :: http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
===============================================================

==================
FIGHT THE RIGHT!
==================






---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.

-----
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
http://pnews.org/ (links)
http://pnews.org/PhpWiki/ (West Coast News Wiki)
http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (East Coast News Wiki)
===============================================================
Sub/Unsub [pnews-l - rhetoric] :: http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
===============================================================

==================
FIGHT THE RIGHT!
==================

     -----
    / o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
http://pnews.org/ (links)
http://pnews.org/PhpWiki/ (West Coast News Wiki)
http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (East Coast News Wiki)
===============================================================
Sub/Unsub [pnews-l - rhetoric] :: http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
===============================================================

==================
 FIGHT THE RIGHT!
==================


Reply via email to