On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:39:56PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> I think we do want the warning to occur even on lstatless systems,
> otherwise we are creating a portability trap for those developing
> lstatless.

Its not a warning, its an error.

What's the portability trap?


-- 
Michael G Schwern        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Thanks, applied.  Or, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
as we Bulgarian EBCDIC users like to say.    
        -- Jarkko Hietaniemi in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to