On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:30:12 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [re cc'ing p5p]
Dangit, sorry about that. Still getting used to writing mails in gmail. > demerphq wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:30:47 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez > > > I was waiting for Hugo's advice on this patch. > > > Also, it would be nice to have something that works with /i, if that can > > > be done reliably. > > > > Its done. I hope reliably too, but there is this annoying segfault > > with SA that i need to figure out. While it does appear to be related > > to my code im a bit pushed to come up with an explanation for why > > slight changes to code around the regex could change the segfault > > behaviour. (Note i cant get SA to segfault when i add debug text, and > > SA is the only thing ive tested against that has problems, and the > > code that has problems is evaled closures (possibly inside of a fork > > on win32) so it could be almost anything.) > > That's what I was alluding to. Yeah fair enough. Im working on it though. :-) > > > To be honest i would really love it if someone with stronger perl guts > > and stonger C skills than me could give the code a good once over. > > Even if whoever does it knows nothing about the regex engines > > particulars a sanity check would be really appreciated. > > /me has to look at it more thoroughly then :) Thanks that would be really appreciated. > > I really hope that some of you guys try the patch out. Some hands on > > feedback would be appreciated, especially as im on Win32 and have no > > real access to *nix right now. > > At least on Linux, all tests pass. Is that the second patch i posted or the first Raphael? (trie_5.patch.gz is the latest) Cheers, yves -- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. +Gandhi
