On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:26:49 +0100, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgot to include the list on this.... > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:48:02 +0100, H.Merijn Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:49:50 +0100, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, attached patch adds a bit to perlhack.pod about the new options, > > > and cleans up a bit of the make target documentation. > > > > You're quite rigid here in the statements about win32: > > > > +(Not available on Win32) > > + > > > > There's no "todo" about this. Is it indeed as stated, or is > > > > + (Not yet available on Win32) > > + > > > > more appropriate? > > Actually i think both would apply depending on the actual target you > mean. (Consider that valgrind isnt going to work on Win32) I also > suspect that I forgot to send through a patch to win32/makefile.mk and > win32/Makefile which were meant to accompany the doc patch. Im just > resync'ing now so ill follow up on this later.
Actually theres nothing to follow up on. Steve fixed the issues that i had in mind already. Thanks Steve. And overall i would say that yes, the targets marked "not available" probably never will be. Although thats just my $0.02. Cheers, Yves -- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. +Gandhi
