On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:50:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G Schwern) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:26:25PM +0000, Nigel Sandever wrote:
> > > The backwards compatibility argument is bunk: we can do exactly what was
> > I wouldn't care if it was called 'println' except that it adds two
characters
> > instead of saving two.
>
> Kindly forget keystroke savings. It is an utter red herring. You do not
> code at 60 WPM. Most of the time spend coding is (I hope) reading and
> thinking.
>
It's not the typing effort, but the visual clutter of
print $this, "\n";
versus
say $this;
But enough. I'll let this slip quietly away.
njs.
