On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:48:37AM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > I haven't checked that the following core changes made their way into > ExtUtils::ParseXS : (Ken?) > > Change 18270 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2002/12/09 00:25:26 > > Subject: [perl #18256] xsubpp can make nested comments in C code > From: Nicholas Clark (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 7 Nov 2002 14:58:14 -0000 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
According to the Changes file, Nicholas made the above change in ExtUtils::ParseXS for version 0.09. > Change 20650 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/08/12 12:32:29 > > Subject: [PATCH 5.8.1 @20218] xsubpp: wrong code > From: Ilya Zakharevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 06:19:02 -0700 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This one isn't in ParseXS.pm but would be easy to apply. I'm not xsubpp-savvy enough to determine what situation it's needed in to test it, though. > As I will probably be involved in putting ExtUtils::ParseXS into > bleadperl (:p) I suppose I could maintain it on CPAN as well, on behalf > of P5P. There are some harmless "not stay shared" warnings under bleadperl that could be easily fixed by changing some lexicals to globals, but as I understand it these are in the category of things that Dave Mitchell intends to make no longer warn (confirmation appreciated). Should these be cleaned up? Or just wait until they go away?
