On 6/5/05, Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't really be fixed short of using some other static SV to mark unused > elements (cf PL_sv_placeholder), but personally I think that's throwing > good money after bad.
I agree with this. exists() on arrays seems to be a bit useless to me, or not well-defined, and I'm not in favor of sacrifying array performance to make it work. Moreover testing (@_ >= 1) can already be used to count number of arguments (to refer to the OP's problem.)