On 6/13/05, vadim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Probably better this way: > > >> > > >> --- perl/win32/Makefile.orig 2005-06-12 03:22:35.000000000 -0700 > > >> +++ perl/win32/Makefile 2005-06-12 12:42:16.129360000 -0700 > > >> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ > > >> !ENDIF > > >> > > >> # specify static extensions here > > >> -STATIC_EXT = Cwd Compress/Zlib > > >> +STATIC_EXT = > > > > > > Why? I'm OK with that, but why? > > > > Because normally you wouldn't want anything built statically. > > It should show an example, though, so something like: > > > > #STATIC_EXT = Cwd Compress/Zlib > > STATIC_EXT = > > > > would be good. > > Indeed, better way is to have an example but empty string by default. > > Also, win32/Makefile and win32/makefile.mk differ by "DYNAMIC_EXT" > macro.
Could that be because DYNAMIC_EXT macro is only used in the CE build? I dont see a single reference to it in the Makefile.mk except where it is defined, and from what i can tell theres nothing that uses it except in Makefile.ce Note its defined totally differently in < config.[vb]c(?:64)? > and is claculated dynamically in buildext.pl by FindExt.pm Am i missing some way this macro is useful? Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
