On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:54:55AM -0400, John Peacock wrote: > Steve Hay wrote: > >Can they be changed to anything more friendly? I don't really > >understand what the code is doing. 9**9**2 is OK, but 9**9**3 goes pow! > > That's trying to create a +inf value, AFAICT. I suspect you are just > going to have to find a way to expect those errors if the Borland > runtime insists on warning on OVERFLOW.
Which doesn't seem a very conformant thing for it to do, but sadly waving pointy sticks at it isn't going to shut it up. Nicholas Clark
