On 6/16/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://developer.intel.com/software/products/noncom/faq.htm > > Q. What does noncommercial mean? > A. Non-commercial means that you are not getting compensated in any form > for the products and/or services you develop using these Intel(r) > Software Products > > I'm not criticising Intel for this. Merely noting that they are very > restrictive. For example, one couldn't make a request for TPF development > grant and use the compiler.
Couldn't you do most of your dev with GCC and throw in ICC-compliance-testing as a non-compensated lagniappe, under a TPF grant? You aren't going to be delivering executables under a TPF grant, and your deliverable is obviously going to have to work under GCC, IANAL but I do not see any problem. Considering the terms of the FAQ, here's how you could use ICC to help with work funded by a grant from The Perl Foundation: You do the work using GCC, and testing the work to see if it builds under ICC, and patching it so it does, is a separate, unfunded (and therefore allowed) research project. -- David L Nicol free as in unenforceable
