On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:18:01PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:10:51PM +0100, Dave Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > My reading of the Perl_sv_vcatpvfn documenttaion (and reading of the code)
> > is that it's perfectly legit to pass a null svargs: one of other of args
> > or svargs should contain a value, but not both. Also, all *args derefs are
> > protected by an if(args).
>
> But not svargs. See the line with "sv_catsv(sv, *svargs);"
Yes, but it's still perfectly legal and ok to pass a hardcoded Null as the
svargs param (as long as args isn't also null), so delaring svargs as NN
is wrong.
--
This is a great day for France!
-- Nixon at Charles De Gaulle's funeral
