Re: 'no strict "refs"' considered harmful?

[Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan]

On Jul 24, Tassilo von Parseval said:

On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 02:44:12AM -0400 Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
  for (...) {
    my $code = sub { ... };
    no strict 'refs';
    *$_ = $code;
  }

   for (...) {
        no strict 'refs';
        *$_ = sub {
            use strict;
            ...
        };
   }

There's also the somewhat ugly:

  for (...) {
    *{; no strict 'refs'; \*$_ } = sub { ... };
  }

I think it's awfully obfuscated, though.  Yes, I could see it being 
written this way:

  for (...) {
    *{;
    no strict 'refs';
    \*$_} = sub { ... };
  }

and driving people to madness.

--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan         %  How can we ever be the sold short or
RPI Acacia Brother #734     %  the cheated, we who for every service
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/  %  have long ago been overpaid?
http://www.perlmonks.org/   %    -- Meister Eckhart