On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:34:02AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote: > Yes, the second call to NATIVE_TO_UTF is still present > in the modified code. Typically, one wouldnt want to > do a NATIVE_TO_UTF(NATIVE_TO_UTF(uv)) which is what I > am doing due to the second call. But does that make a > difference to miniperl ?
Well, the code is linked into miniperl, so I can only assume that it's getting called. If so, does removing the second instance of NATIVE_TO_UTF() improve things? Nicholas Clark
