RE: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "express"

[Brust, Corwin]

-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Lateur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like
"with" or "express"


On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote:

>Normally what you'd say is:
>
>  with (%record) {
>    ....
>  }
>
>(look at me, using Larry's new ... operator :-)

No you didn't. You typed four dots.

-- 
        Bart.
Hmmm 

        ... . ...;

or maybe:
        
        while (... .. ...) {
                q(can't touch this!)
        }
        

-Corwin