Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators

[Bryan C . Warnock]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> You'd obviously want to have a module that collected together your
> favourite new operators.  But if they were lexically scoped, they'd
> be lexically scoped to the module they were defined in, i.e. your
> collection rather than your main program.  We're going to have to
> think of a way to consistently say "do this in my caller's lexical
> scope" without it becoming a nasty upvar hell.

Not that it adds much information, but this is the lament of RFC 40.

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])