> This is the kind of thing that keeps Perl instructors in business... And Perl out of businesses :-( More than anything I think the inability to write C<sub list> DWIMishly argues that we need it built-in. But we also need a *very* careful design of the semantics. Damian
- RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to force list c... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... skud
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... John Porter
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen
- Change "($one, $two)=&q... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Change "($one, ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, ... Tom Christiansen